TokenGet responds to the allegations by Mobilink-Coin

TokenGet

This morning, TokenGet countered in an effort to discredit Mobilink-coin. Only problem is, after all the fluff, it really holds no water. Their headline alone if true, would incriminate themselves.

I published a post earlier today with my observations on the allegations of theft by TokenGet. Please review to understand the context of what I am about to explain.

I asked to review 100% of the chats and e mails between Mobi and the TokenGet/Blockchain Mob. NEVER was there any communication between the two companies wherein TokenGet accused Mobi of being a scam. Not once.

There was a dispute over payment from the request of the extension. That was it. Then after the cloud was locked out and the millions of coin was stolen, TokenGet issued their statement accusing mobi of being a scam to cover their asses.

If Mobi was a scam, the headline on the TokenGet counter attack would place 100% of the alleged scam on the company that designed the token in the first place. TokenGet.

It’s also funny that Tokenget is asking for the staff of Mobi to identify themselves when their staff is represented by cartoon characters.

TokenGet

And on their sister site, BlockchainMob

BlockchainMob

Who are these folks? Viktor Petrov, Stoyan Josifov, Pavlin Genove, Veliko Minkov, Ivaylo Uzunov, Georgi Hadjiev, Maggy Ilieva, Kostadin Cherkezov, George Alexiev, Karen New, and Nashwan Khatib.

At the end of the day, I am alleging that TokenGet intentionally harmed Mobi and made up a cover story to hide the fact they chose to defraud Mobi in retaliation of the failure of their payment negotiations.

And if the contracting agreement was with TokenGet why is the Mobi logo appearing on the blockchainmob website? I see the e mails are from blockchainmob.

Also, I am looking into possible threats against, and the harassment of well known ICO advisors who had given Mobi a top rating and in the last couple of days, downgraded their opinions. hard to believe that the victim of the alleged theft of tokens would warrant this change.

 

Did TokenGet steal tokens from Mobilink Coin?

GetTokens Blockchainmob

Late last night an ICO called Mobilink-Coin made allegations against TokenGet, a company they contracted with to develop the backend of their system and facilitate the launch of their ICO. The allegations look credible especially if you understand the potential motivation that would support the allegations.

The ICO industry is actually quite horrible which is why the SEC’s of many countries are having to step in to protect the consumer. Most of the ICO’s in play right now will never make it. Many are frauds and ponzi schemes. While I was focused on individual ICO’s, I learned there was a whole new circus in town that I had never considered. The developer companies behind the scenes who either intentionally rip off their ICO clients or the ones that seek to destroy their clients if they don’t get their way. We saw that with Shehar Yar and Blocksims. Proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

So back to this case. Very simple timeline. April 15th was the original launch date for Mobilink-Coin. Mobi needed to extend until May 10th. TokenGet wanted all of their money before doing the extension. Both parties were not able to negotiate and Mobi received communication both in chat and via e mail from Viktor Petrove and Nashwan Khatib threatening to take drastic measures. The last communication was on April 19th.

What does it mean to “take drastic measures”? In a civil business world that might mean legal action.  Even with the threat, Mobi was still wanting to move forward with TokenGet which is why Mobi did not lock them out of the system. The events that followed had to have been the drastic measures.

Over a period of a week, as stated by Mobilink-Coin:

Somebody with permissions signed into MOBILINK-COIN’s Google-cloud and changed passwords and all credentials, which, in addition to other information, stole the company’s payment data.

Somebody moved the back end platform from their Google-cloud account and stole the mobi investor database.

Somebody misappropriated tokens to four separate wallets without  the authorization or knowledge of Mobilink. There was a possible theft, or at a minimum, misappropriation of at least 900 million tokens. Those four transactions occurred just days before the extended ICO end date which equates to 15 times more than the entire ICO sold.

tokenget blockchainmob

Even though somebody went in to cover their tracks, it is interesting to note the transfers took place while Mobilink was locked out of the dashboard and the dashboard was not able to conduct transfers during this period.

And somebody has gone in and deleted the transactions in question but I have the original transaction links:

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf45bf5369a24a2ce1efcecbe713bed213a66e2210af96a678243abde08b76a04

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4583e3b362cd808a8a210745bc5722af30d52de384d3bacacb4311069ac713b9

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4892478f85b5a8b00d2e78f915e31ddf41dfb8e4cd90671b57f47d0fc506a627

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x078324d3046393e0cf971f2c549cebc3e4783eba8f39863be9504ec9d13c9503

TokenGet attempted to extort MOBILINK-COIN by refusing to give back Mobi’s database and platform in which the company already paid all fees in advance of TokenGet doing any work.

So I have to ask the reasonable reader of this post….is it a safe assumption to think that the contractor, TokenGet and it’s sister company Blockchain Mob conducted the fraudulent actions listed above? Stealing tokens? Stealing client’s financial records? Stealing a client’s investor database? All of which is the property of Mobilink. Who does that? Who locks somebody out of their own cloud? Who transfers proprietary and confidential data off of a client’s cloud. What is the intent? Revenge? Extortion? Secretly seizing assets? Or just to be assholes and harm a company.

No matter the events that led up to this moment. I am focused on the “drastic measures” that were taken by the contractor. Seems to have crossed the line and no matter the relationship between the two, should serve as a warning to other ICO’s when doing business with any ICO developers.

And full disclosure…I do not work for Mobi. Mobi does not own this blog, as they stated in their counter. Mobi does not compensate me. I came upon Mobi late last year. I saw the potential of this ICO. I met the principals of the company. I saw proof of concept of their product and I became a fan. Then when I see companies and individuals trying to rip off companies I am a fan of, as a former investigator, i sort through the details and express my opinion of allegations I investigate.

 

 

 

 

Did Mobilink-coin get screwed over by a dev in Bulgaria or was it incompetency?

Tokenget

Tonight an e mail went out from Mobilink-coin to its investors:

Dear MOBILINK-COIN Investor,

We have very important information to share with all our investors. This affects all Token holders.

The MOBL Token was created by a company in Sophia, Bulgaria, who provided our turnkey ICO Backend Solution. Unfortunately, there was a misstep in that the Token was unverified, unaudited, and MOBILINK-COIN was not aware of this to resolve it in time.

The MOBL coin will be listed on a minimum of four (4) exchanges in May 2018. To be in compliance with the major Exchanges, we needed to restructure and re-issue the Token. This is required for MOBILINK-COIN to have full control over its audit and verification. We know you will support us in ensuring compliance is in order and that your investment is kept safe. The current Token Contract will be abandoned, and a NEW Contract has already been created.

At this time, investors are unable to log into their back office on the platform. We have record of all investors’ Tokens and will be providing what is due each investor directly into their own wallet. We will provide you with further information and instructions as soon as possible.

Thank you for your understanding.

This is so sad. I personally know the principals of Mobilink-Coin. Based upon a positive endorsement, they hired a company in Sophia, Bulgaria to build the back office for Mobilink-Coin. I don’t have all the details yet but allegations have been made to me about this ICO programming team that I am not at liberty to share at this time.

My only question is whether this was incompetence on the part of this dev, a oversight that did not audit the MobL or a powerplay to extort Mobilink-coin.

Maybe it was just an honest mistake and has nothing to do with Shehar Yar and his efforts to try to destroy one of the most legit ICO’s on the market. I do know however, if there was any alleged fraudulent intent whatsoever, I will devote my time to turn over all the rocks and find and identify all the snakes, clowns and jokers.